NWS Cooperative Projects Request for Proposals
and Proposal Instructions
We do not anticipate having funding for a 2008 RFP. The following provides information on what will likely be the process if we have funds for 2009.
2007 RFP
The Cooperative Program for Operational Meteorology, Education and Training (COMET) announces its 2007 Outreach Program Request for Proposals (RFP) for Cooperative Projects, which are described below along with proposal submission requirements. The first draft of the NWS Cooperative proposal is due to the appropriate NWS region by 22 January 2007. The final version must be submitted to the COMET Outreach Program by 19 March 2007. We anticipate funding four projects. (Applications
for the smaller COMET Partners Projects are accepted
at any time until funding runs out.) Funding is contingent on the NWS receiving their budget approval in January 2007.
1. Description
of Program
NWS Cooperative Projects promote broad research activities
involving a university department or program working closely with
one or more NWS offices (including WFOs, RFCs, and National Centers). University
participants may include undergraduate and/or graduate students and
several faculty and/or research associates (see budget restrictions).
Important features include:
- Truly collaborative research—the NWS office(s) must play
a significant role in the research (this is the most common reason
proposals are rejected)
- May be 1 to 2 years in duration (NOTE: This is a change from previous years—3-year projects will NOT be allowed this year)
- Typically have budgets in line with previous years' awards (recently,
annual awards have averaged about $35,000, with a range from about
$20,000 to $40,000)
- Researchers who have a Cooperative Project that is ending must submit
new proposals. The proposal can be for follow-on work related to the
new project, but should not be for unfinished work in the original
project (unless unusual circumstances exist).
- If the university is currently funded by the NWS through a Cooperative
Institute or the Collaborative Science Technology and Applied Research
(CSTAR) program, the work in the COMET proposal should be significantly
different or a significant enhancement to the currently funded work
and should be clearly identified as such in the proposal
- We cannot fund proposals from NCAR or government labs or costs associated
with their collaboration on proposed projects. They may participate
as unfunded partners.
2. Suggested
Collaboration Subjects
Examples of collaborative, applied research activities include, but are not
limited to, those that will:
- Facilitate or improve the use of new observing systems, as long as
enhancement of a specific forecast process is a part of the proposal.
Proposals simply to gather new data will not be accepted.
- Improve understanding of an important local mesoscale forecasting
problem
- Improve forecasting on a regional or national scale
- Create case studies or new data analysis techniques with wide application
and usefulness in teaching, research, and operational forecasting
- Bring together students, operational forecasters, educators, and
national or local experts in forums designed to share information (workshops,
conferences, etc.)
- Promote better use of forecasts by the general public and specific
user communities
- Involve the use of local domain modeling, especially those employing
the workstation version of the Meso-Eta model (available at no charge
from NCEP) or WRF model
The NWS has identified the following topic areas as having the highest
priority for research (NOTE: the list is in no particular order, see
the NWS Strategic Plan):
| Topic |
Examples |
| Precipitation |
Quantitative Precipitation Estimation (QPE)
Quantitative Precipitation Forecasts (QPF), Probabilistic QPF
Precipitation Type |
| Hydrology |
Flash flood forecast techniques
Probabilistic river predictions, verification of deterministic
and probabilistic river forecasts
Distributed hydrologic models
Calibration techniques for lumped or distributed hydrologic
models |
| Climate |
Prediction of seasonal-to-interannual and decadal climate variability
and the impacts of these variabilities on extreme weather events |
| Tropical Cyclones |
Track, intensity
Associated precipitation
Hazardous weather |
| Marine Weather |
Winds
Coastal and open ocean waves
Fog |
| Local Weather |
Effect of topography and other surface forcing
Severe convection, including tornadoes
Winter weather |
| Aviation Hazards |
Ceiling and visibility forecasts
Turbulence
Icing
Thunderstorms |
| IFPS |
Improve gridded forecast process
Improve gridded verfication |
| Fire Weather |
Conditions conducive to the rapid development of wildfires
Smoke dispersion |
The NWS also encourages proposals to formulate and test hydrologic
prediction techniques and decision support methodology for the Advanced
Hydrologic Prediction Service (AHPS). The AHPS program infuses new science
and technology to create information rich, visually oriented products
to satisfy diverse customer needs and improve NWS flood warnings and
water resource forecasts.
Information on AHPS is located at http://www.nws.noaa.gov/oh/ahps.
3. Budget
A budget
summary sheet must be provided for each year
of the proposed project. Cost effectiveness is an important consideration
in the review process.
Please note that requests for COMET funds should be listed in
terms of annual expenses beginning at the start of the project,
while NWS funds are broken down by fiscal year (which
starts on 1 Oct.). Funding is expected by 1 June 2007, and your budget
can reflect a start date then or any time thereafter.
The following items will not be funded in NWS Cooperative
Projects:
- Faculty salaries in excess of two months per budget year
- Journal publications with an NWS co-author (costs will be paid directly
by the NWS)
- Computers and related hardware (unless special circumstances exist
and the request is approved by the COMET director)
- Foreign travel (requests for exceptions should be made in writing
to the COMET director and must include justification for the proposed
trip)
The following items will be funded by the NWS and should be listed under
the NWS column on the budget summary sheet:
- NWS computers and related hardware
- Travel for NWS or other federal employees
- Journal or preprint publication charges for papers co-authored by
NWS employees
- NCDC data (free to the NWS)
Contributions by the university are taken into consideration in the
review process. Consequently, institutions are encouraged to document
any cost sharing or cost reductions, such as the use of off-campus overhead
rates, waiving of overhead, donations of faculty time or facilities,
etc.
The estimated NWS staff hours per fiscal year must be included on the
NWS budget form. This number is used to evaluate the involvement of the
NWS office(s) in the proposed project. Any additional contributions provided
by the NWS should be documented.
A copy of the contracting language is available here.
We recommend that your contracts office review this page during the proposal
process and identify any major discrepancies your institution and UCAR
may have (attach separately to proposal). This will help shorten the
contracting process if your project is selected.
4. Proposal Format
Your
proposal should be approximately 10 to 15 pages double-sided (not including
items 1, 5, and 6). The proposal must contain
the following components, assembled in the order listed:
-
-
Cover Page: Signed by the appropriate
university and NWS officials. Attach additional sheets for NWS signatures
if more than one NWS office is involved.
-
-
Main Proposal:
- Statement of Work: Describe the proposed project, objectives,
methodology, and expected outcomes.
- Task Description: Summarize the tasks to be conducted and describe
the work that each of the participants (NWS and university) will
perform. NOTE: Proposals are usually rejected
when the participation of the NWS office(s) is minimal. Merely
providing data is not considered a significant
NWS role.
- Schedule: Provide a schedule for each year of the project.
- Expected Benefits: Discuss the benefits to both science and
operational forecasting. Describe how the proposed project addresses
NWS priorities, the added value it will bring to forecast office
operations, and to what extent results may be transferable to
other forecast offices. Describe any products or forecasting
tools that may be developed as part of the project and any training
that will be conducted to ensure they are used by forecasters.
Explain how the results will be disseminated to forecasters and
the larger meteorological or hydrological communities, as well
as the educational community and others who may benefit.
- Budget: In addition to the budget form(s),
provide a short explanation of the budget. Describe university
and NWS contributions to the project. Provide justification for
any unusual budget requests.
- Curricula Vitae: Please limit to no more than two pages for
each person.
-
-
University's Indirect Rate Agreement: Include the most recent copy
from the cognizant auditor
5. Review Criteria
NWS
Cooperative Projects are awarded on the basis of a competitive review
process. The review panel consists of two NWS representatives, two university
faculty or researchers, and two members of the COMET staff (the Outreach
Program manager and a meteorologist or hydrologist). The reviewers rate
each proposal using the following categories:
- Extent to which the project meets NWS priorities (20 points)
- Extent to which the project meets Outreach Program objectives (20
points)
- Technical and scientific merit (20 points)
- University commitment as indicated by resource contributions (10
points)
- Commitment of NWS office(s) as indicated by resource contributions
(10 points)
- Cost effectiveness (10 points)
- Education/training and outreach activities (10 points)
After discussing the proposals, the review panel submits its recommendations
to the Director of COMET and the Chief Scientist (NWS Office of Science
and Technology), who make the final decision on awards.
6. Submission Procedures
for NWS Review
All proposals must go through a preliminary review
by the regional NWS SSD
Chief in which the participating NWS office(s) is located. The NCEP
Principal Scientist will review projects involving collaboration with any
of the National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP). Draft proposals
are due to them by 22 January 2007. They will suggest revisons and
work with you to resolve any problems. Once the SSD Chief or Principal Scientist
is satisfied with the proposal, the regional director will provide the endorsement
letter.
7. Submission
Procedures for COMET Final Review
The deadline for submission of final proposals to the Outreach Program is no later than 19 March 2007. We prefer that all of the proposal pieces, including those provided by the NWS region, come in one package. It is the responsibility of the principal investigator(s) to ensure that complete and properly assembled proposals are received by the Outreach Program no later than 19 March.
The complete proposal package should include one unbound original arranged
in the following order:
-
NWS Endorsement Letter
-
-
-
Main Proposal including Statement of Work, Task Description, Schedule,
Expected Benefits Discussion, Budget Summary Page,
CVs
-
-
University's indirect rate agreement
The package must also include nine, bound, double-sided copies of the first
four items listed above (i.e., no NWS checklist and no indirect rate
agreement).
The proposal and copies should be submitted
to the Outreach Program manager:
Dr. Victoria C. Johnson
Outreach Program Manager
UCAR/COMET
P.O. Box 3000*
Boulder, Colorado 80307
*For Fed-Ex:
3450 Mitchell Lane
Boulder, Colorado 80301
Tele: 303-497-8361 |
*For UPS:
1850 Table Mesa Drive
Boulder, CO 80303
Tele: 303-497-8361 |
8.
For More Information
Please contact Vickie Johnson by telephone
at (303) 497-8361 or e-mail at outreach@comet.ucar.edu.
|